Storm season is upon us, and with climate change bringing us more severe and more frequent storms. Flooding is happening more often. Everytime there's flooding someone talks about the insanity of building on a flood plane. Usually with a picture of a sign announcing a development of executive homes, sat in a field of water. The thing is. The problem isn't building in flood planes. The problem is building shitty buildings in flood planes. Naturally the Dutch have a thing or tow to say on this 1/n

This is Maasbommel. A small city on the banks of the Maas river in the Netherlands. The settlement has existed here for best part of a millennia. Most of the old city is built on the inside of the dijks, which protect it from the water levels of the Maas river (aka the Meuse). But these homes. They are built on the "wrong" side of the dijk. They have nothing between them and the flood waters of the Maas. On the face of it they look like pretty normal modern homes. 2/n

@quixoticgeek Your thread stopped! I imagine it was going to explain how the homes are designed for flood resilience. Which is definitely a trendy thing at the moment.

But I feel "Why not just not build on the floodplain?" NL is short of space, so I can see the argument there, but most places aren't. Also, nl will do it properly because floods are in national psyche, they take it seriously. Imagine this done by UK housing developers, plus the governance that gave us Grenfell?

@quixoticgeek It does! I wonder why the rest didn't thread properly through my Mastodon instance.....

And I agree with your thread, while still also thinking "but if you don't need to do that, maybe just don't build on the floodplain" ;-)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
(void *) social site

(void*)