Once again for the people at the back. The purpose of public transport is to transport the public. Making money from doing so is a secondary purpose at best.

Noone talks about the profitability of the motorway network. So why do we do the same for public transport?

@quixoticgeek it’s because public transport is considered to be for the poor, so it’s useless and expendable to the rich

@scavello "equality is not when everyone has a car, but when the rich take public transport"

@quixoticgeek I live a small-medium size spread out city, so public transport is inefficient because it relies on profitability, so it actually takes the same amount of time to take a bus as it does to walk to your destination. It’s really sad

Follow

@scavello public transport doesn't have to be like that. But that will require investment to fix.

Which city?

@quixoticgeek I’d rather not say due to privacy reasons. But I will say I’m in western canada

@scavello maple sauce city it is then. Sprawl and suburbia are the enemy of livable.

Is maple leaf city full of stroads ?

@quixoticgeek lol yea, but the city council has been installing a lot of bikes lanes which is an improvement for non car accessibility.

Full transparency though, I do drive (an EV) as it’s required for my work.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
(void *) social site

(void*)